JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 29, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90936.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/3429    most recent
90936.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, F. Z
Right arrow Articles by Pare, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, F. Z
Right arrow Articles by Pare, D.
Submitted on August 19, 2008
Revised on October 17, 2008
Accepted on October 22, 2008

TIMING OF IMPULSES FROM THE CENTRAL AMYGDALA AND BED NUCLEUS OF THE STRIA TERMINALIS TO THE BRAINSTEM

Frank Z Nagy1 and Denis Pare1*

1 Rutgers University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pare{at}axon.rutgers.edu.

The amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) are thought to subserve distinct functions with the former mediating rapid fear responses to discrete sensory cues and the latter longer "anxiety-like" states in response to diffuse environmental contingencies. Yet, these structures are reciprocally connected and their projection sites overlap extensively. To shed light on the significance of BNST-amygdala connections, we compared the antidromic response latencies of BNST and central amygdala (CE) neurons to brainstem stimulation. Whereas the frequency distribution of latencies was unimodal in BNST neurons (~10 ms mode), that of CE neurons was bimodal (~10 and ~30 ms modes). However, after stria terminalis (ST) lesions, only short-latency antidromic responses were observed, suggesting that CE axons with long conduction times course through the ST. Compared to the direct route, the ST greatly lengthens the path of CE axons to the brainstem, an apparently disadvantageous arrangement. Since BNST and CE share major excitatory basolateral amygdala (BL) inputs, lengthening the path of CE axons might allow synchronization of BNST and CE impulses to brainstem when activated by BL. To test this, we applied electrical BL stimuli and compared orthodromic response latencies in CE and BNST neurons. The latency difference between CE and BNST neurons to BL stimuli approximated that seen between the antidromic responses of BNST cells and CE neurons with long-conduction times. These results point to a hitherto unsuspected level of temporal coordination between the inputs and outputs of CE and BNST neurons, supporting the idea of shared functions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Duvarci, E. P. Bauer, and D. Pare
The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Mediates Inter-individual Variations in Anxiety and Fear
J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10357 - 10361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.