JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 6, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90948.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/523    most recent
90948.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laboissière, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ostry, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laboissière, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ostry, D. J.
Submitted on August 21, 2008
Revised on April 27, 2009
Accepted on May 4, 2009

Impedance Control and its Relation to Precision in Orofacial Movement

Rafael Laboissière1, Daniel Robert Lametti, and David J. Ostry2*

1 INSERM U864
2 McGill University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ostry{at}motion.psych.mcgill.ca.

Speech production involves some of the most precise and finely timed patterns of human movement. Here, in the context of jaw movement in speech, we show that spatial precision in speech production is systematically associated with the regulation of impedance and in particular, with jaw stiffness. We estimated stiffness and also variability during movement using a robotic device to apply brief force pulses to the jaw. Estimates of stiffness were obtained using the perturbed position and force trajectory and an estimate of what the trajectory would be in the absence of load. We estimated this "reference trajectory" using a new technique based on Fourier analysis. A moving-average (MA) procedure was used to estimate stiffness by modeling restoring force as moving average of previous jaw displacements. The stiffness matrix was obtained from the steady-state of the MA model. We applied this technique to data from 31 subjects whose jaw movements were perturbed during speech utterances and kinematically matched non-speech movements. We observed systematic differences in stiffness over the course of jaw lowering and raising movements that were correlated with measures of kinematic variability. Jaw stiffness was high and variability was low early and late in the movement when the jaw was elevated. Stiffness was low and variability was high in the middle of movement when the jaw was lowered. Similar patterns were observed for speech and non-speech conditions. The systematic relationship between stiffness and variability points to the idea that stiffness regulation is integral to the control of orofacial movement variability.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.