JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 4, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90966.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/2002    most recent
90966.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geis, H.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Borst, J. G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geis, H.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Borst, J. G. G.
Submitted on August 26, 2008
Revised on January 29, 2009
Accepted on January 30, 2009

Intracellular responses of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones

Hans-Ruediger Geis1 and J. Gerard G. Borst1*

1 Erasmus MC

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.borst{at}erasmusmc.nl.

Changes in the temporal envelope are important defining features of natural acoustic signals. Many cells in the inferior colliculus (IC) respond preferentially to certain modulation frequencies, but how they accomplish this is not yet clear. We therefore made whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in the IC of anesthetized mice while presenting sinusoidal amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The relation between the number of evoked spikes and modulation frequency was used to construct rate modulation transfer functions (rMTFs). We observed different types of rate tuning, including band-pass (16%), band-reject (13%), high-pass (6%) and low-pass (6%) tuning. In the high-pass rMTF neurons and some of the low-pass rMTF neurons, the tuning characteristics appeared to be already present in the inputs. In both band-pass and band-reject rMTF neurons, the non-linear relation between membrane potential and spike probability ensured preferential spiking during only a small part of the modulation period. Band-pass rMTF neurons had rapidly rising EPSPs, allowing good phase-locking to brief tones and intermediate modulation frequencies. At low modulation frequencies, adaptation of their spike threshold contributed to the onset response. In contrast, band-reject rMTF neurons responded with small EPSPs or IPSPs to brief tones. In these cells, a power law could describe the supra-linear relation between average membrane potential and spike rate. Differences in timing of synaptic input and presence or absence of spike adaptation therefore define band-pass and band-reject rate tuning to SAM tones in the mouse IC.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.