JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 21, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90976.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/1722    most recent
90976.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cao, D.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Khalsa, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cao, D.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Khalsa, P. S.
Submitted on August 28, 2008
Revised on January 13, 2009
Accepted on January 15, 2009

Position sensitivity of feline paraspinal muscle spindles to vertebral movement in the lumbar spine

Dong-Yuan Cao1, Joel G. Pickar1*, Weiqing Ge1, Allyson Ianuzzi2, and Partap S. Khalsa2

1 Palmer College of Chiropractic
2 State University of New York at Stony Brook

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pickar_j{at}palmer.edu.

Muscle spindles contribute to sensorimotor control by supplying feedback regarding muscle length and consequently information about joint position. While substantial study has been devoted to determining the position sensitivity of spindles in limb muscles there appears to be no data on their sensitivity in the low back. We determined the relationship between lumbar paraspinal muscle spindle discharge and paraspinal muscle lengthening estimated from controlled cranialward movement of the L6 vertebra in anesthetized cats. Ramp (0.4 mm s-1) and hold displacements (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.2 mm for 2.5 s) were applied at the L6 spinous process. Position sensitivity was defined as the slope of the relationship between the estimated increase in muscle length and mean instantaneous frequency at each length. To enable comparisons with appendicular muscle spindles where joint angle was measured, we also calculated sensitivity in terms of the L6 and L7 intervertebral flexion angle (IVA). This angle was estimated from measurements of facet joint capsule strain (FJC) based upon a previously established relationship between IVA and FJC strain in the cat lumbar vertebral column during lumbar flexion. Single unit recordings were obtained from 12 muscle spindle afferents. Longissimus and multifidus muscles contained the receptive field of 10 and 2 afferents, respectively. Mean position sensitivity was 16.3 imp s-1 mm-1 (10.6 to 22.1, 95%CI, p<0.001). Mean angular sensitivity was 5.2 imp s-1 degree-1 (2.6 to 8.0, p<0.003). These slope estimates were more than 3.5 times greater compared with appendicular muscle spindles and their confidence intervals did not contain previous slope estimates for the sensitivity of appendicular spindles from the literature. Potential reasons for and the significance of the apparently high position sensitivity in the lumbar spine are discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.