JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91007.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/2775    most recent
91007.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Billings, G.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, M. C W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Billings, G.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, M. C W
Submitted on September 6, 2008
Revised on February 20, 2009
Accepted on March 11, 2009

Memory retention and Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity

Guy Billings1* and Mark C W van Rossum1

1 University of Edinburgh

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.billings{at}ucl.ac.uk.

Memory systems should be plastic to allow for learning, however they should also retain earlier memories. Here we explore how synaptic weights and memories are retained in models of single neurons and networks equipped with spike timing dependent plasticity. We show that for single neuron models the precise learning rule has a strong effect on the memory retention time. In particular, a soft-bound, weight-dependent learning rule has a very short retention time as compared to a learning rule that is independent of the synaptic weights. Next, we explore how the retention time is reflected in receptive field stability in networks. As in the single neuron case, the weight dependent learning rule yields less stable receptive fields than a weight independent rule. However, receptive fields stabilize in the presence of sufficient lateral inhibition, demonstrating that plasticity in networks can be regulated by inhibition and suggesting a novel role for inhibition in neural circuits.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.