JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 11, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91021.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2447    most recent
91021.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winges, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winges, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.
Submitted on September 11, 2008
Revised on March 4, 2009
Accepted on March 4, 2009

Effects of object compliance on three-digit grasping

Sara A Winges1*, Stephanie E Eonta2, John F Soechting2, and Martha Flanders1

1 University of Minnesota
2 Univ. of Minnesota

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: swinges{at}umn.edu.

Compared with rigid objects, grasping and lifting compliant objects presents additional uncertainties. For any static grasp, forces at the fingertips depend upon factors including the locations of the contact points, and the contact forces must be coordinated to maintain equilibrium. For compliant objects, the locations and orientations of the contact surfaces change in a force dependent manner, thus changing the force requirements. Furthermore, every force adjustment then results in additional changes in object shape. This study characterized force and muscle activation patterns in this situation. Fingertip forces were measured as subjects grasped and lifted a 200g object using their thumb, index and ring fingers. A spring was sometimes placed under the index and/or ring finger contact surface. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from ten hand muscles and one proximal arm muscle. The patterns of grip (normal) force and muscle activity were similar across conditions during the load and lift phases, but their amplitude depended upon whether or not the contact surface was compliant. Specifically, the grip force increased smoothly during the load phase of the task under all conditions. To the contrary, the tangential contact (load) force did not increase monotonically when one or more of the contact surfaces were compliant, resulting in a decoupling of the grip and load force.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.