JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 25, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91040.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/2751    most recent
91040.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honeycutt, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honeycutt, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, T. R.
Submitted on September 17, 2008
Revised on March 16, 2009
Accepted on March 18, 2009

Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations

Claire Fletcher Honeycutt1*, Jinger S Gottschall2, and T. Richard Nichols3

1 Georgia Tech
2 Emory University School of Medicine
3 Georgia Institute of Technology

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: claire.honeycutt{at}gmail.com.

The sensory and neural mechanisms underlying postural control have received much attention in recent decades but remain poorly understood. Our objectives were 1) to establish the decerebrate cat as an appropriate model for further research into the sensory mechanisms of postural control and 2) to observe what elements of the postural response can be generated by the brainstem and spinal cord. Ten animals were decerebrated using a modified premammillary technique, which consists of a premammillary decerebration that is modified with a vertical transection near the subthalamic nucleus to eliminate spontaneous locomotion. Horizontal support surface perturbations were applied to all four limbs and electromyographic recordings were collected from 14 muscles of the right hindlimb. Muscle activation was quantified with tuning curves, which compared increases and decreases in muscle activity to background and graphed the difference against perturbation direction. Parallels were drawn between these tuning curves, which were further quantified with a principal direction and breadth (range of directions of muscle activation) and data collected by other researchers from the intact animal. We found a strong similarity in the direction and breadth of the tuning curves generated in the decerebrate and intact cat. These results support our hypothesis that directionally specific tuning of muscles in response to support surface perturbations does not require the cortex further indicating a strong role for the brainstem and spinal cord circuits in mediating directionally appropriate muscle activation patterns.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.