JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 28, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91050.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/1813    most recent
91050.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khayat, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khayat, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roelfsema, P. R.
Submitted on September 19, 2008
Revised on January 21, 2009
Accepted on January 23, 2009

Time-Course of Attentional Modulation in the Frontal Eye Field During Curve Tracing

Paul S. Khayat1*, Arezoo Pooresmaeili2, and Pieter R. Roelfsema2

1 McGill University
2 Netherlands Inst for Neuroscience

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.khayat{at}mcgill.ca.

Neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) register incoming visual information and select visual stimuli that are relevant for behaviour. Here we investigated the timing of the visual response and the timing of selection by recording from single FEF neurons in a curve tracing task that requires shifts of attention followed by an oculomotor response. We found that the behavioural selection signal in area FEF had a latency of 147 ms and that it was delayed substantially relative to the visual response, which occurred 50 ms after stimulus presentation. We compared the FEF responses to activity previously recorded in the primary visual cortex (area V1) during the same task. Visual responses in area V1 preceded the FEF responses, but the latency of selection signals in areas V1 and FEF were similar. The similarity of timing of selection signals in structures at opposite ends of the visual cortical processing hierarchy supports the view that stimulus selection occurs in an interaction between widely separated cortical regions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.