JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 5, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.91065.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/276    most recent
91065.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pittman, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pittman, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, E. F.
Submitted on September 19, 2008
Revised on October 15, 2008
Accepted on October 28, 2008

GENIOGLOSSUS AND INTRINSIC ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITIES IN IMPEDED AND UNIMPEDED PROTRUSION TASKS

Lora J. Pittman1 and E. Fiona Bailey1*

1 The University of Arizona

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ebailey{at}u.arizona.edu.

Eight muscles invest the human tongue, four extrinsic muscles have external origins and insert into the tongue body and four intrinsic muscles originate and terminate within the tongue. Previously, we noted minimal activation of the genioglossus tongue muscle during impeded protrusion tasks (i.e., having subjects push the tongue against a force transducer), suggesting that other muscles play a role in the production of tongue force. Accordingly, we sought to characterize genioglossus tongue muscle activities during impeded and unimpeded protrusion tasks (i.e., having subjects slowly and smoothly move the tongue out of their mouth). EMG and single motor unit potentials of the extrinsic genioglossus muscle were recorded with tungsten microelectrodes, and EMG activities of intrinsic tongue muscles were recorded with hook-wire electrodes inserted into the anterior tongue body. Tongue position was detected by an isotonic transducer coupled to the tongue tip. Protrusive force was detected by a force transducer attached to a rigid bar. Genioglossus and intrinsic tongue muscles were simultaneously active in both impeded and unimpeded protrusion tasks. Genioglossus whole muscle EMG and single motor unit activities changed faithfully as a function of tongue position, with increased discharge associated with protrusion, and decreased discharge associated with retraction back to the rest position. In contrast, during the impeded protrusion task drive to the genioglossus muscle remained constant as protrusion force increased. Conversely, intrinsic tongue muscle activities appropriately followed changes in both tongue position and force. Importantly, we observed significantly higher levels of intrinsic muscle activity in the impeded protrusion task. These observations suggest that protrusion of the human tongue requires activation of the genioglossus and intrinsic protrudor muscles, with the former more important for establishing anterior-posterior tongue location, and the latter playing a greater role in the generation of protrusive force. A biomechanical model of these actions is provided and discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.