JN AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 29, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.91066.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/141    most recent
91066.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamali, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, K. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamali, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, K. E
Submitted on September 22, 2008
Revised on October 13, 2008
Accepted on October 24, 2008

Response of vestibular-nerve afferents innervating utricle and saccule during passive and active translations

Mohsen Jamali1, Soroush G Sadeghi1, and Kathleen E Cullen1*

1 McGill University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kathleen.cullen{at}mcgill.ca.

The distinction between sensory inputs that are a consequence of our own actions from those that result from changes in the external world is essential for perceptual stability and accurate motor control. In this study, we investigated whether linear translations are encoded similarly during active and passive translations by the otolith system. Vestibular-nerve afferents innervating the saccule or utricle were recorded in alert macaques. Single unit responses were compared during passive whole body, passive head-on-body, and active head-on-body translations (vertical, fore-aft or lateral) to assess the relative influence of neck proprioceptive and efference copy related-signals on translational coding. The response dynamics of utricular and saccular afferents were comparable, and similarly encoded head translation during passive whole-body versus head-on-body translations. Furthermore, when monkeys produced active head-on-body translations with comparable dynamics, the responses of both regular and irregular afferents remained comparable to those recorded during passive movements. Our findings refute the proposal that neck proprioceptive and/or efference copy inputs coded by the efferent system function to modulate the responses of the otolith afferents during active movements. We conclude that the vestibular periphery provides faithful information about linear movements of the head in the space coordinates, regardless of whether they are self- or externally-generated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Rosengren, N. P. M. Todd, and J. G. Colebatch
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by brief interaural head acceleration: properties and possible origin
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2009; 107(3): 841 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. X. Brooks and K. E. Cullen
Multimodal Integration in Rostral Fastigial Nucleus Provides an Estimate of Body Movement
J. Neurosci., August 26, 2009; 29(34): 10499 - 10511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.