JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 15, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91090.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/302    most recent
91090.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenderoth, N.
Right arrow Articles by Swinnen, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wenderoth, N.
Right arrow Articles by Swinnen, S. P.
Submitted on September 30, 2008
Revised on March 24, 2009
Accepted on April 13, 2009

Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements

Nicole Wenderoth1*, Marieke Van Dooren1, Anneleen Vandebroek1, Jeroen De Vos1, Sophie Vangheluwe1, Cathy M Stinear2, Winston D Byblow3, and Stephan P. Swinnen4

1 KU Leuven
2 University of Auckland
3 University of Auckland-Tamaki Campus
4 K.U. Leuven

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nici.wenderoth{at}faber.kuleuven.be.

In discrete reaction time (RT) tasks, it has been shown that non-symmetric bimanual movements are initiated slower than symmetric movements in response to symbolic cues. By contrast, no such RT differences are found in response to direct cues ("direct cue effect"). Here, we report 3 experiments showing that the direct cue effect generalizes to rhythmical bimanual movements and that RT cost depends on different cue features, namely (1) symbolic vs. direct or (2) integrated (i.e. action of both hands is indicated as one entity) vs. dissociated (i.e. action of each hand is indicated separately). Our main finding was that dissociated symbolic cues were most likely processed serially resulting in the longest RTs, which were substantially reduced with integrated symbolic cues. However, extra RT costs for switching to non-symmetrical bimanual movements were overcome only when the integrated cues were direct. We conclude that computational resources might have been exceeded when the response needs to be determined for each hand separately, but not when a common response for both hands is selected. This supports the idea that bimanual control benefits from conceptual binding.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.