JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.91100.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/875    most recent
91100.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baliki, M. N
Right arrow Articles by Apkarian, A V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baliki, M. N
Right arrow Articles by Apkarian, A V.
Submitted on October 1, 2008
Revised on December 2, 2008
Accepted on December 2, 2008

Parsing pain perception between nociceptive representation and magnitude estimation

Marwan N Baliki1, Paul Y Geha1, and A Vania Apkarian1*

1 Northwestern University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a-apkarian{at}northwestern.edu.

Assessing the size of objects rapidly and accurately clearly has survival value. A central multi-sensory module for subjective magnitude assessment is therefore highly likely, suggested by psychophysical studies, and proposed on theoretical grounds. Given that pain perception is fundamentally an assessment of stimulus intensity, it must necessarily engage such a central module. Accordingly, we compared fMRI activity of pain magnitude ratings to matched visual magnitude ratings in 14 subjects. We show that brain activations segregate into two groups, one preferentially activated for pain, and another equally activated for both visual and pain magnitude ratings. The properties of regions in the first group were consistent with encoding nociception, while those in the second group with attention and task control. Insular cortex responses similarly segregated to a pain specific area and an area (extending to lateral prefrontal cortex) conjointly representing perceived magnitudes for pain and vision. These two insular areas were differentiated by their relationship to task variance, ability to encode perceived magnitudes for each stimulus epoch, temporal delay differences, and brain intrinsic functional connectivity. In a second group of subjects (n = 11) we contrasted diffusion tensor imaging-based white matter connectivity for these two insular areas and observed anatomical connectivity closely corresponding to the functional connectivity identified with fMRI. These results demonstrate that pain perception is due to the transformation of nociceptive representation into subjective magnitude assessment within the insula. We moreover argue that we have identified a multi-sensory cortical area for 'how much' complimentary and analogous to the 'where' and 'what' as described for central visual processing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Moayedi and I. Weissman-Fogel
Is the Insula the "How Much" Intensity Coder?
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1345 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.