JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 4, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91104.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/2030    most recent
91104.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, M.
Right arrow Articles by Avela, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, M.
Right arrow Articles by Avela, J.
Submitted on October 3, 2008
Revised on January 27, 2009
Accepted on January 27, 2009

Excitability at the motoneuron pool and motor cortex is specifically modulated in lengthening compared to isometric contractions

Markus Gruber1*, Vesa Linnamo2, Vojko Strojnik3, Timo Rantalainen2, and Janne Avela2

1 University Potsdam
2 University of Jyvaskyla
3 University of Ljubljana

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: markus.gruber{at}uni-potsdam.de.

Neural control of muscle contraction seems to be unique during muscle lengthening. The present study aimed to determine the specific sites of modulatory control for lengthening compared to isometric contractions. We used stimulation of the motor cortex and corticospinal tract to observe changes at the spinal and cortical levels. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) were evoked in biceps brachii and brachioradialis during maximal and submaximal lengthening and isometric contractions at the same elbow angle. Sizes of CMEPs and MEPs were lower in lengthening contractions for both muscles (by ~ 28% and ~ 16%, respectively; p < .01) but MEP to CMEP ratios increased (by ~ 21%; p < .05). These results indicate reduced excitability at the spinal level but enhanced motor cortical excitability for lengthening compared to isometric muscle contractions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.