JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 14, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91106.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1575    most recent
91106.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berke, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eichenbaum, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berke, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eichenbaum, H.
Submitted on October 3, 2008
Revised on January 7, 2009
Accepted on January 7, 2009

Striatal versus hippocampal representations during win-stay maze performance

Joshua D. Berke1*, Jason T. Breck, and Howard Eichenbaum2

1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2 BU

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdberke{at}umich.edu.

The striatum and hippocampus are widely held to be components of distinct memory systems that can guide competing behavioral strategies. However, some electrophysiological studies have suggested that neurons in both structures encode spatial information and may therefore make similar contributions to behavior. In rats well-trained to perform a win-stay radial maze task, we recorded simultaneously from dorsal hippocampus and from multiple striatal subregions, including both lateral areas implicated in motor responses to cues and medial areas that work cooperatively with hippocampus in cognitive operations. In each brain region, movement through the maze was accompanied by the continuous sequential activation of sets of projection neurons. Hippocampal neurons overwhelmingly were active at a single spatial location (place cells). Striatal projection neurons were active at discrete points within the progression of every trial - especially during choices or following reward delivery - regardless of spatial position. Place cell type firing was not observed even for medial striatal cells entrained to the hippocampal theta rhythm. We also examined neural coding in earlier training sessions, when rats made use of spatial working memory to guide choices, and again found that striatal cells did not show place cell type firing. Prospective or retrospective encoding of trajectory was not observed in either hippocampus or striatum, at either training stage. Our results indicate that, at least in this task, dorsal hippocampus uses a spatial foundation for information processing that is not substantially modulated by spatial working memory demands. By contrast, striatal cells do not use such a spatial foundation, even in medial subregions that cooperate with hippocampus in the selection of spatial strategies. The progressive dominance of a striatum-dependent strategy does not appear to be accompanied by large changes in striatal or hippocampal single-cell representations, suggesting that the conflict between strategies may be resolved elsewhere.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. A. Pennartz, J. D. Berke, A. M. Graybiel, R. Ito, C. S. Lansink, M. van der Meer, A. D. Redish, K. S. Smith, and P. Voorn
Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12831 - 12838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Kubota, J. Liu, D. Hu, W. E. DeCoteau, U. T. Eden, A. C. Smith, and A. M. Graybiel
Stable Encoding of Task Structure Coexists With Flexible Coding of Task Events in Sensorimotor Striatum
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2142 - 2160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.