JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91121.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2649    most recent
91121.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meftah, E.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meftah, E.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Submitted on October 7, 2008
Revised on February 10, 2009
Accepted on February 10, 2009

Instructed delay discharge in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex within the context of a selective attention task

El-Mehdi Meftah1, Stéphanie Bourgeon2, and C. Elaine Chapman3*

1 Univ de Montreal
2 Univ de Montréal
3 Univ. de Montreal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.elaine.chapman{at}umontreal.ca.

The neuronal mechanisms that contribute to tactile perception were studied using single unit recordings from the cutaneous hand representation of primate primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortex. This study followed up on our recent observation that S1 and S2 neurones developed a sustained change in discharge during the instruction period of a directed attention task. We determined the extent to which the symbolic light cues, that signaled the modality (tactile, visual) to attend and discriminate, elicited changes in discharge rate during the instructed delay (ID) period of the attention task, and the functional importance of this discharge. ID responses, consisting of a sustained increase or decrease in discharge during the 2s instruction period, were present in ~40% of the neurones in S1 and S2. ID responses in both cortical regions were very similar in most respects (frequency, sign, latency, amplitude), suggesting a common source. A major difference, however, was related to attentional modulation during the ID period: attentional influences were almost entirely restricted to S2, and these effects were always superimposed on the ID response (additive effect). These findings suggest that the underlying mechanisms for ID discharge and attention are independent. ID discharge significantly modified the initial response to the standard stimuli (competing texture and visual stimuli), usually enhancing responsiveness. We also showed that tactile detection in humans is enhanced during the ID period. Together, the results suggest that ID discharge represents a priming mechanism that prepares cortical areas to receive and process sensory inputs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.