JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 12, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.91146.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/1    most recent
91146.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghatpande, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghatpande, A. S.
Submitted on October 16, 2008
Revised on November 3, 2008
Accepted on November 4, 2008

Is the olfactory bulb computationally similar to the retina?

Ambarish Sham Ghatpande1*

1 Monell Chemical Senses Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aghatpande{at}monell.org.

The computational role of the olfactory bulb remains a mystery after sixty years of physiological research. Recently, Fantana et al. (2008) have proposed a new model of bulb function based on sparse inhibitory connections between glomeruli, the functional units of the bulb, rather than the existing lateral inhibition model. I present a summary of their model here and its implications along with comparison to recent work in the very similar Drosophila olfactory system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.