JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 21, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91157.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/1921    most recent
91157.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vyazovskiy, V. V
Right arrow Articles by Tononi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vyazovskiy, V. V
Right arrow Articles by Tononi, G.
Submitted on October 20, 2008
Revised on January 16, 2009
Accepted on January 19, 2009

Triggering slow waves during NREM sleep in the rat by intracortical electrical stimulation: effects of sleep/wake history and background activity

Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy1, Ugo Faraguna2, Chiara Cirelli3, and Giulio Tononi4*

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison
2 University of Wisconsin
3 University of Wisconsin/Madison
4 Univ. Wisconsin/Madison

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gtononi{at}wisc.edu.

In humans, NREM sleep slow waves occur not only spontaneously but can also be induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (Massimini et al. 2007). Here we investigated whether slow waves can also be induced by intracortical electrical stimulation during sleep in rats. Intracortical local field potential (LFP) recordings were obtained from several cortical locations while the frontal or the parietal area was stimulated intracortically with brief (0.1 ms) electrical pulses. Recordings were performed in early sleep (first 2-3 h after light onset) and late sleep (6-8 h after light onset). The stimuli reliably triggered LFP potentials that were visually indistinguishable from naturally occurring slow waves. The induced slow waves shared the following features with spontaneous slow waves: i) they were followed by spindling activity in the same frequency range (~ 15 Hz) as spontaneously occurring sleep spindles; ii) they propagated through the neocortex from the area of the stimulation; iii) compared to late sleep, waves triggered during early sleep were larger, had steeper slopes and fewer multipeaks. Peristimulus background spontaneous activity had a profound influence on the amplitude of the induced slow waves: they were virtually absent if the stimulus was delivered immediately after the spontaneous slow wave. These results show that in the rat a volley of electrical activity that is sufficiently strong to excite and recruit a large cortical neuronal population is capable of inducing slow waves during natural sleep.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.