JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 4, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91196.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2348    most recent
91196.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vonderschen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vonderschen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, H.
Submitted on November 10, 2008
Revised on March 2, 2009
Accepted on March 2, 2009

Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus

Katrin Vonderschen1 and Hermann Wagner1*

1 RWTH Aachen

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wagner{at}bio2.rwth-aachen.de.

Barn owls process sound-localization information in two parallel pathways, the midbrain and the forebrain pathway. Exctracellular recordings of neural responses to auditory stimuli from far advanced stations of these pathways, the auditory arcopallium in the forebrain and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain, demonstrated that the representations of interaural time difference and frequency in the forebrain pathway differ from those in the midbrain pathway. Specifically, low-frequency representation was conserved in the forebrain pathway, while it was lost in the midbrain pathway. Variation of interaural time difference yielded symmetrical tuning curves in the midbrain pathway. By contrast, the typical forebrain-tuning curve was asymmetric with a steep slope crossing zero time difference and a less steep slope towards larger contralateral time disparities. Low sound frequencies contributed sensitivity to contralateral leading sounds underlying these asymmetries, whereas high frequencies enhanced the steepness of slopes at small interaural time differences. Furthermore, the peaks of time-disparity tuning curves were wider in the forebrain than in the midbrain. The distribution of the steepest slopes of best interaural time differences in the auditory arcopallium, but not in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus was centered at zero time difference. The distribution observed in the auditory arocpallium is reminiscent to the situation observed in small mammals. We speculate that the forebrain representation may serve as a population code supporting fine discrimination of central interaural time differences and coarse indication of laterality of a stimulus for large interaural time differences.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Perez, S. J. Shanbhag, and J. L. Pena
Auditory Spatial Tuning at the Crossroads of the Midbrain and Forebrain
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1472 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Reches and Y. Gutfreund
Auditory and Multisensory Responses in the Tectofugal Pathway of the Barn Owl
J. Neurosci., July 29, 2009; 29(30): 9602 - 9613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.