JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 29, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91348.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/606    most recent
91348.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. L.
Submitted on December 22, 2008
Revised on April 23, 2009
Accepted on April 24, 2009

Reproducible measurement of human motoneuron excitability with magnetic stimulation of the corticospinal tract

Peter G. Martin1, Anna L. Hudson1, Simon C. Gandevia1, and Janet L. Taylor1*

1 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.taylor{at}powmri.edu.au.

It is difficult to test responses of human motoneurons in a controlled way or to make longitudinal assessments of adaptive changes at the motoneuron level. These studies assessed the reliability of responses produced by magnetic stimulation of the corticospinal tract. Cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) were recorded in the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) on two separate days. On each day, four sets of stimuli were delivered at the maximal output of the stimulator, with the final two sets at least 10 min after the initial sets. Sets of stimuli were also delivered at different stimulus intensities to obtain stimulus-response curves. In addition, on the second day, responses at different stimulus intensities were evoked during weak voluntary contractions. Responses were normalized to the maximal muscle compound action potential (Mmax). CMEPs evoked in the relaxed FDI were small, even when stimulus intensity was maximal (3.6 ± 2.5% Mmax) but much larger during a weak contraction (e.g. 26.2 ± 10.2% Mmax). CMEPs evoked in the relaxed muscle at the maximal output of the stimulator were highly reproducible both within (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.83, session 1; ICC = 0.87, session 2) and between sessions (ICC = 0.87). ICCs for parameters of the input-output curves, which included measures of motor threshold, slope and maximal response size, ranged between 0.87 and 0.62. These results suggest that responses to magnetic stimulation of the corticospinal tract can be assessed in relaxation and contraction and can be reliably obtained for longitudinal studies of motoneuronal excitability.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.