HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/1/337    most recent 00330.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, K. G. Articles by Sato, T. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, K. G. Articles by Sato, T. R.

Frontal Eye Field Activity Before Visual Search Errors Reveals the Integration of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Salience

¹Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute and ²Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Submitted 31 March 2004; accepted in final form 12 August 2004

We investigated the saccade decision process by examining activity recorded in the frontal eye field (FEF) of monkeys performing 2 separate visual search experiments in which there were errors in saccade target choice. In the first experiment, the difficulty of a singleton search task was manipulated by varying the similarity between the target and distractors; errors were made more often when the distractors were similar to the target. On catch trials in which the target was absent the monkeys occasionally made false alarm errors by shifting gaze to one of the distractors. The second experiment was a popout color visual search task in which the target and distractor colors switched unpredictably across trials. Errors occurred most frequently on the first trial after the switch and less often on subsequent trials. In both experiments, FEF neurons selected the saccade goal on error trials, not the singleton target of the search array. Although saccades were made to the same stimulus locations, presaccadic activation and the magnitude of selection differed across trial conditions. The variation in presaccadic selective activity was accounted for by the variation in saccade probability across the stimulus–response conditions, but not by variations in saccade metrics. These results suggest that FEF serves as a saccade probability map derived from the combination of bottom-up and top-down influences. Peaks on this map represent the behavioral relevance of each item in the visual field rather than just reflecting saccade preparation. This map in FEF may correspond to the theoretical salience map of many models of attention and saccade target selection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mulckhuyse, S. Van der Stigchel, and J. Theeuwes Early and Late Modulation of Saccade Deviations by Target Distractor Similarity J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1451 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Murthy, S. Ray, S. M. Shorter, J. D. Schall, and K. G. Thompson Neural Control of Visual Search by Frontal Eye Field: Effects of Unexpected Target Displacement on Visual Selection and Saccade Preparation J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2485 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ogawa and H. Komatsu Condition-Dependent and Condition-Independent Target Selection in the Macaque Posterior Parietal Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 721 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Peng, M. E. Sereno, A. K. Silva, S. R. Lehky, and A. B. Sereno Shape Selectivity in Primate Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 796 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kim and M. A. Basso Saccade Target Selection in the Superior Colliculus: A Signal Detection Theory Approach J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 2991 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.F.W. Neggers, W. Huijbers, C. M. Vrijlandt, B.N.S. Vlaskamp, D.J.L.G. Schutter, and J. L. Kenemans TMS Pulses on the Frontal Eye Fields Break Coupling Between Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2765 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Heinzle, K. Hepp, and K. A. C. Martin A Microcircuit Model of the Frontal Eye Fields J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9341 - 9353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Serences and S. Yantis Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Shen and M. Pare Guidance of Eye Movements During Visual Conjunction Search: Local and Global Contextual Effects on Target Discriminability J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2845 - 2855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Bisley and M. E. Goldberg Neural Correlates of Attention and Distractibility in the Lateral Intraparietal Area J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1696 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Thompson, K. L. Biscoe, and T. R. Sato Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9479 - 9487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]