JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 2174-2182, 2005. First published December 1, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00449.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/2174    most recent
00449.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.

Interhemispheric Coupling of Corticospinal Excitability Is Suppressed During Voluntary Muscle Activation

Sophie L. Pearce1,3, Philip D. Thompson2,3 and Michael A. Nordstrom1,3

1Discipline of Physiology, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, 2Department of Medicine, and 3Research Centre for Human Movement Control, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia

Submitted 30 April 2004; accepted in final form 23 November 2004

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) show a trial-to-trial variation in size at rest that is positively correlated for muscles of the same, and opposite, upper limbs. To investigate the mechanisms responsible for this we have examined the effect of voluntary activation on the correlated fluctuations of MEP size. In 8 subjects TMS was concurrently applied to the motor cortex of each hemisphere using 2 figure-8 coils. MEPs (n = 50) were recorded from left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and extensor digitorum communis. At rest, MEPs were significantly positively correlated for pairs of muscles of the same (75% of comparisons) and opposite limb (56% of comparisons). The correlation for within-limb muscle pairs was strongest for FDI and ADM. In contrast, between-limb MEP correlations showed no somatotopic organization. Voluntary activation reduced the strength of MEP correlations between limbs, even for muscle pairs that remained at rest while a remote upper limb muscle was active. In contrast, activation of a remote muscle did not affect the strength of MEP correlation for muscle pairs within the same limb that remained at rest. For within-limb comparisons, activation of one or both muscles of a pair reduced the strength of the MEP correlation, but to a lesser extent than for between-limb pairs. It is concluded that the process linking corticospinal excitability in the two hemispheres is suppressed during voluntary activation, and that different processes contribute to common fluctuations in MEP size for muscles within the same limb.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Nordstrom, Research Centre for Human Movement Control, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, South Australia (E-mail: michael.nordstrom{at}adelaide.edu.au)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.