|
|
||||||||
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California
Submitted 6 May 2004; accepted in final form 26 November 2004
The macaque middle temporal area (MT) is exquisitely sensitive to visual motion and there is a large amount of evidence that neural activity in MT is tightly correlated with the perception of motion. The mechanisms by which MT neurons achieve their directional selectivity, however, have received considerably less attention. We investigated the motionenergy model as a description of motion mechanisms in macaque MT. We first confirmed one of the predictions of the motionenergy model; macaquesjust like humansperceive a reversed direction of motion when a stimulus reverses contrast with every displacement (reverse-phi). This reversal of perceived direction had a clear correlate in the neural responses of MT cells, which were predictive of the monkey's behavioral decisions. Second, we investigated how multiple motionenergy components are combined. Psychophysical data have been used to argue that motionenergy components representing opposite directions are subtracted from each other. Our data show, however, that the interactions among motionenergy components are more complex. In particular, we found that the influence of a given component on the response to a stimulus consisting of multiple components depends on factors other than the response to that component alone. This suggests that there are subthreshold nonlinear interactions among multiple motionenergy components; these could take place within MT or in earlier stages of the motion network such as V1. We propose a model that captures the complexity of these component interactions by means of a competitive interaction among the components. This provides a better description of the MT responses than the subtractive motion opponency envisaged in the motionenergy model, even when the latter is combined with a gain-control mechanism. The competitive interaction extends the dynamic range of the cells and allows them to provide information on more subtle changes in motion patterns, including changes that are not purely directional.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Curran and C. Lynn Monkey and humans exhibit similar motion-processing mechanisms Biol Lett, December 23, 2009; 5(6): 743 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Soechting, J. Z. Juveli, and H. M. Rao Models for the Extrapolation of Target Motion for Manual Interception J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1491 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Huang, T. D. Albright, and G. R. Stoner Stimulus Dependency and Mechanisms of Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13889 - 13906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schlack, B. Krekelberg, and T. D. Albright Recent History of Stimulus Speeds Affects the Speed Tuning of Neurons in Area MT J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11009 - 11018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Krekelberg, R. J. A. van Wezel, and T. D. Albright Interactions between Speed and Contrast Tuning in the Middle Temporal Area: Implications for the Neural Code for Speed. J. Neurosci., August 30, 2006; 26(35): 8988 - 8998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Krekelberg, R. J. A. van Wezel, and T. D. Albright Adaptation in Macaque MT Reduces Perceived Speed and Improves Speed Discrimination J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 255 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Krekelberg, A. Vatakis, and Z. Kourtzi Implied Motion From Form in the Human Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4373 - 4386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |