JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 2908-2921, 2005. First published December 1, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00473.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/5/2908    most recent
00473.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krekelberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krekelberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, T. D.

Motion Mechanisms in Macaque MT

Bart Krekelberg and Thomas D. Albright

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California

Submitted 6 May 2004; accepted in final form 26 November 2004

The macaque middle temporal area (MT) is exquisitely sensitive to visual motion and there is a large amount of evidence that neural activity in MT is tightly correlated with the perception of motion. The mechanisms by which MT neurons achieve their directional selectivity, however, have received considerably less attention. We investigated the motion–energy model as a description of motion mechanisms in macaque MT. We first confirmed one of the predictions of the motion–energy model; macaques—just like humans—perceive a reversed direction of motion when a stimulus reverses contrast with every displacement (reverse-phi). This reversal of perceived direction had a clear correlate in the neural responses of MT cells, which were predictive of the monkey's behavioral decisions. Second, we investigated how multiple motion–energy components are combined. Psychophysical data have been used to argue that motion–energy components representing opposite directions are subtracted from each other. Our data show, however, that the interactions among motion–energy components are more complex. In particular, we found that the influence of a given component on the response to a stimulus consisting of multiple components depends on factors other than the response to that component alone. This suggests that there are subthreshold nonlinear interactions among multiple motion–energy components; these could take place within MT or in earlier stages of the motion network such as V1. We propose a model that captures the complexity of these component interactions by means of a competitive interaction among the components. This provides a better description of the MT responses than the subtractive motion opponency envisaged in the motion–energy model, even when the latter is combined with a gain-control mechanism. The competitive interaction extends the dynamic range of the cells and allows them to provide information on more subtle changes in motion patterns, including changes that are not purely directional.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. Krekelberg, Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037 (E-mail: bart{at}salk.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
W. Curran and C. Lynn
Monkey and humans exhibit similar motion-processing mechanisms
Biol Lett, December 23, 2009; 5(6): 743 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Soechting, J. Z. Juveli, and H. M. Rao
Models for the Extrapolation of Target Motion for Manual Interception
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1491 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X. Huang, T. D. Albright, and G. R. Stoner
Stimulus Dependency and Mechanisms of Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT
J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13889 - 13906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Schlack, B. Krekelberg, and T. D. Albright
Recent History of Stimulus Speeds Affects the Speed Tuning of Neurons in Area MT
J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11009 - 11018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Krekelberg, R. J. A. van Wezel, and T. D. Albright
Interactions between Speed and Contrast Tuning in the Middle Temporal Area: Implications for the Neural Code for Speed.
J. Neurosci., August 30, 2006; 26(35): 8988 - 8998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Krekelberg, R. J. A. van Wezel, and T. D. Albright
Adaptation in Macaque MT Reduces Perceived Speed and Improves Speed Discrimination
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 255 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Krekelberg, A. Vatakis, and Z. Kourtzi
Implied Motion From Form in the Human Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4373 - 4386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.