JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 3007-3011, 2005. First published December 15, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00877.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/5/3007    most recent
00877.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shao, L.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shao, L.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, F. E.

REPORT

Electrophysiological Evidence Using Focal Flash Photolysis of Caged Glutamate That CA1 Pyramidal Cells Receive Excitatory Synaptic Input From the Subiculum

Li-Rong Shao and F. Edward Dudek

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Anatomy and Neurobiology Section, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Submitted 25 August 2004; accepted in final form 8 December 2004

The hippocampus sends efferent fibers to the subiculum, which projects to the entorinal cortex. Previous studies suggest that the hippocampal CA1 area may receive a projection back from the subiculum. This hypothesis was tested using whole cell recording from CA1 pyramidal cells while subicular neurons were selectively stimulated with focal flash photolysis of caged glutamate, which avoids stimulation of fibers of passage. Control experiments showed that focal flash stimulations caused direct glutamate-mediated depolarizations and bursts of action potentials in the recorded CA1 pyramidal cells, but only when the stimulation targeted the somatodendritic regions of a neuron, not the axons. To block GABAA-mediated inhibition and isolate local excitatory circuits, bicuculline was applied to minislices containing only the isolated CA1 area and the subiculum. Of 24 CA1 pyramidal cells, 25% (6 of 24) consistently generated repetitive excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in response to flash stimulation in the subiculum. The responsive neurons were located 200–500 µm from the distal end of CA1 and 400–1,100 µm from the stimulation sites in subiculum, suggesting excitatory synaptic projections from the subicular neurons to CA1 pyramidal cells. This study provides new electrophysiological evidence that CA1 pyramidal cells receive excitatory synaptic input from the subiculum. Thus a reciprocal excitatory synaptic circuit connects the subiculum and the CA1 area in the normal adult rat.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. E. Dudek, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Anatomy and Neurobiology Section, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (E-mail: ed.dudek{at}colostate.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. P. Wu, H. L. Huang, M. N. Asl, J. W. He, J. Gillis, F. K. Skinner, and L. Zhang
Spontaneous rhythmic field potentials of isolated mouse hippocampal-subicular-entorhinal cortices in vitro
J. Physiol., October 15, 2006; 576(2): 457 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.