JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 3050-3063, 2005. First published December 22, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00985.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/3050    most recent
00985.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, F.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, F.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.

TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY

Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity

Fan-Gang Zeng1,2,3,5, Ying-Yee Kong3,5, Henry J. Michalewski4 and Arnold Starr3,4

1Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology, 2Biomedical Engineering, 3Cognitive Sciences, 4Neurology, and 5Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California

Submitted 21 September 2004; accepted in final form 17 December 2004

Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity were systematically studied in 21 subjects who had been clinically diagnosed with auditory neuropathy (AN), a recently defined disorder characterized by normal outer hair cell function but disrupted auditory nerve function. Neurological and electrophysical evidence suggests that disrupted auditory nerve activity is due to desynchronized or reduced neural activity or both. Psychophysical measures showed that the disrupted neural activity has minimal effects on intensity-related perception, such as loudness discrimination, pitch discrimination at high frequencies, and sound localization using interaural level differences. In contrast, the disrupted neural activity significantly impairs timing related perception, such as pitch discrimination at low frequencies, temporal integration, gap detection, temporal modulation detection, backward and forward masking, signal detection in noise, binaural beats, and sound localization using interaural time differences. These perceptual consequences are the opposite of what is typically observed in cochlear-impaired subjects who have impaired intensity perception but relatively normal temporal processing after taking their impaired intensity perception into account. These differences in perceptual consequences between auditory neuropathy and cochlear damage suggest the use of different neural codes in auditory perception: a suboptimal spike count code for intensity processing, a synchronized spike code for temporal processing, and a duplex code for frequency processing. We also proposed two underlying physiological models based on desynchronized and reduced discharge in the auditory nerve to successfully account for the observed neurological and behavioral data. These methods and measures cannot differentiate between these two AN models, but future studies using electric stimulation of the auditory nerve via a cochlear implant might. These results not only show the unique contribution of neural synchrony to sensory perception but also provide guidance for translational research in terms of better diagnosis and management of human communication disorders.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F.-G. Zeng, 364 Med Surge II, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1275 (E-mail: fzeng{at}uci.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. L. Phillips, S. J. Richter, and D. McPherson
Voiced Initial Consonant Perception Deficits in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss and Good and Poor Word Recognition
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2009; 52(1): 118 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. J. Oxenham
Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 316 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. Rance, R. Fava, H. Baldock, A. Chong, E. Barker, L. Corben, and M. B. Delatycki
Speech perception ability in individuals with Friedreich ataxia
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2002 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
F.-G. Zeng and S. Liu
Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 367 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. Tang, Y. Zhang, Q. Chang, S. Ahmad, I. Dahlke, H. Yi, P. Chen, D. L. Paul, and X. Lin
Connexin29 Is Highly Expressed in Cochlear Schwann Cells, and It Is Required for the Normal Development and Function of the Auditory Nerve of Mice
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2006; 26(7): 1991 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. Gothelf, N. Farber, E. Raveh, A. Apter, and J. Attias
Hyperacusis in Williams syndrome: Characteristics and associated neuroaudiologic abnormalities
Neurology, February 14, 2006; 66(3): 390 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Oertel
Importance of Timing for Understanding Speech. Focus on "Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity"
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3044 - 3045.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.