HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/6/3635    most recent 00885.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Temchin, A. N. Articles by Ruggero, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Temchin, A. N. Articles by Ruggero, M. A.

Wiener Kernels of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Verification Using Responses to Tones, Clicks, and Noise and Comparison With Basilar-Membrane Vibrations

¹Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Institute for Neuroscience and Hugh Knowles Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; ²Department of Physiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and ³Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Groningen, School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Submitted 25 August 2004; accepted in final form 13 January 2005

Responses to tones, clicks, and noise were recorded from chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs). The responses to noise were analyzed by computing the zeroth-, first-, and second-order Wiener kernels (h₀, h₁, and h₂). The h₁s correctly predicted the frequency tuning and phases of responses to tones of ANFs with low characteristic frequency (CF). The h₂s correctly predicted the frequency tuning and phases of responses to tones of all ANFs, regardless of CF. Also regardless of CF, the kernels jointly predicted about 77% of the features of ANF responses to "frozen" samples of noise. Near-CF group delays of kernels and signal-front delays of responses to intense rarefaction clicks exceeded by 1 ms the corresponding basilar-membrane delays at both apical and basal sites of the chinchilla cochlea. This result, confirming that synaptic and neural processes amount to 1 ms regardless of CF, permitted drawing a map of basilar-membrane delay as a function of position for the entire length of the chinchilla cochlea, a first for amniotic species.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wagner, S. Brill, R. Kempter, and C. E. Carr Auditory Responses in the Barn Owl's Nucleus Laminaris to Clicks: Impulse Response and Signal Analysis of Neurophonic Potential J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1227 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pienkowski, G. Shaw, and J. J. Eggermont Wiener-Volterra Characterization of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex Using Poisson-Distributed Impulse Train Inputs J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3031 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bandyopadhyay, L. A. J. Reiss, and E. D. Young Receptive Field for Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons at Multiple Sound Levels J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3505 - 3515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. D. Young and B. M. Calhoun Nonlinear Modeling of Auditory-Nerve Rate Responses to Wideband Stimuli J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4441 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]