| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York; and 2Departments of Neurobiology, Psychology, and Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Submitted 5 November 2004; accepted in final form 15 February 2005
Previous research has established that orientation selectivity depends to a great extent on suppressive mechanisms in the visual cortex. In this study, we investigated the spatial organization and the time-course of these mechanisms. Stimuli were presented in circular windows of "optimal" and "large" radii. The two stimulus sizes were chosen based on an area-response function measured with drifting gratings at high contrast. The "optimal" size was defined as the smallest radius that elicited the peak response (average value of 0.45°), whereas "large" was defined as two to five times the optimal size. We found that the peak amplitude of tuned enhancement and untuned suppression varied <10% on average with stimulus radius, indicating that they are mainly concentrated in the classical receptive field. However, tuned suppression—in those cells that showed it—was significantly stronger with large stimuli, indicating that this component has a contribution from beyond the classical receptive field. These results imply that spatial context (in large stimuli) enhances orientation selectivity by increasing tuned suppression. We also characterized the time evolution of enhancement, of untuned suppression, and of tuned suppression. The time-course of tuned suppression was markedly slower in time-to-peak and longer in its persistence than untuned suppression. Therefore tuned suppression is likely to be generated by long-range recurrent connections or cortico-cortical feedback, whereas untuned suppression is mainly generated locally in V1.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. N. Johnson, M. J. Hawken, and R. Shapley The Orientation Selectivity of Color-Responsive Neurons in Macaque V1 J. Neurosci., August 6, 2008; 28(32): 8096 - 8106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. Malone and D. L. Ringach Dynamics of Tuning in the Fourier Domain J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 239 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Smith, R. C. Kelly, and T. S. Lee Dynamics of Response to Perceptual Pop-Out Stimuli in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3436 - 3449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Ruksenas, A. Bulatov, and P. Heggelund Dynamics of Spatial Resolution of Single Units in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cat During Brief Visual Stimulation J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1445 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Malone, V. R. Kumar, and D. L. Ringach Dynamics of Receptive Field Size in Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Smith, W. Bair, and J. A. Movshon Dynamics of suppression in macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci., May 3, 2006; 26(18): 4826 - 4834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Mareschal, S. C. Dakin, and P. J. Bex Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images PNAS, March 28, 2006; 103(13): 5131 - 5136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
