JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 883-895, 2005. First published February 23, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01171.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/883    most recent
01171.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corneil, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Elsley, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corneil, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Elsley, J. K.

REPORT

Countermanding Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in Humans: Marching Orders Are Delivered to the Head First

Brian D. Corneil and James K. Elsley

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 11 November 2004; accepted in final form 19 February 2005

The countermanding task requires subjects to cancel a planned movement on appearance of a stop signal, providing insights into response generation and suppression. Here, we studied human eye-head gaze shifts in a countermanding task with targets located beyond the horizontal oculomotor range. Consistent with head-restrained saccadic countermanding studies, the proportion of gaze shifts on STOP trials increased the longer the stop signal was delayed after target presentation, and gaze shift stop-signal reaction times (SSRTs: a derived statistic measuring how long it takes to cancel a movement) averaged ~120 ms across seven subjects. We also observed a marked proportion of trials (13% of all STOP trials) during which gaze remained stable but the head moved toward the target. Such head movements were more common at intermediate stop signal delays. We never observed the converse sequence wherein gaze moved while the head remained stable. SSRTs for head movements averaged ~190 ms or ~70–75 ms longer than gaze SSRTs. Although our findings are inconsistent with a single race to threshold as proposed for controlling saccadic eye movements, movement parameters on STOP trials attested to interactions consistent with a race model architecture. To explain our data, we tested two extensions to the saccadic race model. The first assumed that gaze shifts and head movements are controlled by parallel but independent races. The second model assumed that gaze shifts and head movements are controlled by a single race, preceded by terminal ballistic intervals not under inhibitory control, and that the head-movement branch is activated at a lower threshold. Although simulations of both models produced acceptable fits to the empirical data, we favor the second alternative as it is more parsimonious with recent findings in the oculomotor system. Using the second model, estimates for gaze and head ballistic intervals were ~25 and 90 ms, respectively, consistent with the known physiology of the final motor paths. Further, the threshold of the head movement branch was estimated to be 85% of that required to activate gaze shifts. From these results, we conclude that a commitment to a head movement is made in advance of gaze shifts and that the comparative SSRT differences result primarily from biomechanical differences inherent to eye and head motion.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. D. Corneil, Centre for Brain and Mind, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada (E-mail: bcorneil{at}uwo.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Rezvani and B. D. Corneil
Recruitment of a Head-Turning Synergy by Low-Frequency Activity in the Primate Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 397 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. K. Elsley, B. Nagy, S. L. Cushing, and B. D. Corneil
Widespread Presaccadic Recruitment of Neck Muscles by Stimulation of the Primate Frontal Eye Fields
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1333 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. M. Klier, H. Wang, and J. D. Crawford
Interstitial Nucleus of Cajal Encodes Three-Dimensional Head Orientations in Fick-Like Coordinates
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 604 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. D. Corneil, D. P. Munoz, and E. Olivier
Priming of Head Premotor Circuits During Oculomotor Preparation
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 701 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. M. G. Walton and N. J. Gandhi
Behavioral Evaluation of Movement Cancellation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 2011 - 2024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Campos, A. Cherian, and M. A. Segraves
Effects of Eye Position upon Activity of Neurons in Macaque Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 505 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Chen and M. M. G. Walton
Head Movement Evoked By Electrical Stimulation in the Supplementary Eye Field of the Rhesus Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4502 - 4519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.