JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 1733-1750, 2005. First published May 11, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00019.2005
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/1733    most recent
00019.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marigold, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Patla, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marigold, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Patla, A. E.

Adapting Locomotion to Different Surface Compliances: Neuromuscular Responses and Changes in Movement Dynamics

Daniel S. Marigold and Aftab E. Patla

Gait and Posture Lab, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 7 January 2005; accepted in final form 5 May 2005

Knowledge of how the nervous system deals with surfaces with different physical properties such as compliance that challenge balance during locomotion is of importance as we are constantly faced with these situations every day. The purpose of this study was to examine the control of center of mass (COM) and lower limb dynamics and recovery response modulation of muscle activity during locomotion across an unexpected compliant surface and in particular, scaling behavior across different levels of compliance. Eight young adults walked along a walkway and stepped on an unexpected compliant surface in the middle of the travel path. There were three different levels of surface compliance, and participants experienced either no compliant surface or one of the three compliant surfaces during each trial that were presented in a blocked or random fashion. Whole body kinematics were collected along with surface electromyography (EMG) of selected bilateral lower limb and trunk muscles. The recovery response to the first compliant-surface trial demonstrated muscle onset latencies between 97 and 175 ms, and activity was modulated while on the compliant surface. Vertical COM trajectory was not preserved after contact with the compliant surface: peak vertical COM, while on the compliant surface was lower than when on stable ground. Perturbed-limb knee flexion after toe-off increased with increased surface compliance, which enabled toe clearance with the ground to be similar to control trials. The results suggest that stepping off of a compliant surface is actively modulated by the CNS and is geared toward maintaining dynamic stability.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. E. Patla, Dept. of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada (E-mail: patla{at}healthy.uwaterloo.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. H. van der Linden, D. de Kam, B. G. M. van Engelen, H. T. Hendricks, and J. Duysens
Fast Responses to Stepping on an Unexpected Surface Height Depend on Intact Large-Diameter Nerve Fibers: A Study on Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1A Disease
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1684 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. A. Daley, A. Voloshina, and A. A. Biewener
The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl
J. Physiol., June 1, 2009; 587(11): 2693 - 2707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. S. Marigold and J. E. Misiaszek
Whole-Body Responses: Neural Control and Implications for Rehabilitation and Fall Prevention
Neuroscientist, February 1, 2009; 15(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
H. Hsiao, M. Hause, J. R. Powers Jr, T.-Y. Kau, S. Hendricks, and P. I. Simeonov
Effect of Scaffold End Frame Carrying Strategies on Worker Stepping Response, Postural Stability, and Perceived Task Difficulty
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, February 1, 2008; 50(1): 27 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P.H.J.A. Nieuwenhuijzen and J. Duysens
Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms Play a Role in Stepping on Inverting Surfaces During Gait
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2266 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D.A. McVea and K.G. Pearson
Contextual learning and obstacle memory in the walking cat
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. A. Biewener and M. A. Daley
Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2949 - 2960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. H. van der Linden, D. S. Marigold, F. J.M. Gabreels, and J. Duysens
Muscle Reflexes and Synergies Triggered by an Unexpected Support Surface Height During Walking
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3639 - 3650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.