JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 2263-2274, 2005. First published May 25, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01207.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/2263    most recent
01207.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.

Modulation of Level Response Areas and Stimulus Selectivity of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex

Jiping Zhang1,2, Kyle T. Nakamoto3 and Leonard M. Kitzes1,3

1Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology and 3Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, California; 2Department of Biology, School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Submitted 23 November 2004; accepted in final form 25 May 2005

Sounds commonly occur in sequences, such as in speech. It is therefore important to understand how the occurrence of one sound affects the response to a subsequent sound. We approached this question by determining how a conditioning stimulus alters the response areas of single neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AI) of barbiturate-anesthetized cats. The response areas consisted of responses to stimuli that varied in level at the two ears and delivered at the characteristic frequency of each cell. A binaural conditioning stimulus was then presented ≥50 ms before each of the stimuli comprising the level response area. An effective preceding stimulus alters the shape and severely reduces the size and response magnitude of the level response area. This ability of the preceding stimulus depends on its proximity in the level domain to the level response area, not on its absolute level or on the size of the response it evokes. Preceding stimuli evoke a nonlinear inhibition across the level response area that results in an increased selectivity of a cortical neuron for its preferred binaural stimuli. The selectivity of AI neurons during the processing of a stream of acoustic stimuli is likely to be restricted to a portion of their level response areas apparent in the tone-alone condition. Thus rather than being static, level response areas are fluid; they can vary greatly in extent, shape and response magnitude. The dynamic modulation of the level response area and level selectivity of AI neurons might be related to several tasks confronting the central auditory system.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. M. Kitzes, Dept. of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-1275 (E-mail: lmkitzes{at}uci.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Scholl, X. Gao, and M. Wehr
Level Dependence of Contextual Modulation in Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1616 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes
Temporal Nonlinearity During Recovery From Sequential Inhibition by Neurons in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1897 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.