JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 4314-4330, 2005. First published August 17, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01309.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/4314    most recent
01309.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Paradiso, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Paradiso, M. A.

Background Changes Delay Information Represented in Macaque V1 Neurons

Xin Huang and Michael A. Paradiso

Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

Submitted 20 December 2004; accepted in final form 14 August 2005

In natural behavioral situations, saccadic eye movements not only introduce new stimuli into V1 receptive fields, they also cause changes in the background. We recorded in awake macaque V1 using a fixation paradigm and compared evoked activity to small stimuli when the background was either static or changing as with a saccade. When a stimulus was shown on a static background, as in most previous experiments, the initial response was orientation selective and contrast was inversely correlated with response latency. When a stimulus was introduced with a background change, V1 neurons showed a qualitatively different temporal response pattern in which information about stimulus orientation and contrast was delayed. The delay in the representation of visual information was found with three different types of background change—luminance increment, luminance decrement, and a pattern change with fixed mean luminance. We also found that with a background change, V1 off responses were suppressed and had a shorter time course compared with the static-background situation. Our results suggest that the distribution of temporal changes across the visual field plays a fundamental role in determining V1 responses. In the static-background condition, temporal change in the visual input occurs only in a small portion of the visual field. In the changing-background condition, and presumably in natural vision, temporal changes are widely distributed. Thus a delayed representation of visual information may be more representative of natural visual situations.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Paradiso, Dept. of Neuroscience, 192 Thayer St., Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 (E-mail: Michael_Paradiso{at}Brown.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Huang and M. A. Paradiso
V1 Response Timing and Surface Filling-In
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 539 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. R. Tucker and D. Fitzpatrick
Luminance-Evoked Inhibition in Primary Visual Cortex: A Transient Veto of Simultaneous and Ongoing Response
J. Neurosci., December 27, 2006; 26(52): 13537 - 13547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.