HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/1/284    most recent 01329.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Born, R. T. Articles by Yi, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Born, R. T. Articles by Yi, S.

Temporal Evolution of 2-Dimensional Direction Signals Used to Guide Eye Movements

¹Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ²Harvard University, Program in Mind, Brain and Behavior, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and ³Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Submitted 22 December 2004; accepted in final form 6 September 2005

The smooth pursuit system must integrate many local motion measurements into a coherent estimate of target velocity. Several laboratories have studied this integration process using eye movements elicited by targets, such as tilted bars, containing conflicts between local motion signals measured along contours [one dimensional (1D)] and those measured at the bar's endpoints, or terminators [two dimensional (2D)]. The general finding is that 1D signals dominate early responses, whereas later components of the behavior are determined by 2D signals. We studied the dynamics of the integration process in macaque monkeys by systematically varying the relative proportions of 1D and 2D signals and the retinal eccentricities at which they appeared. Predictably, longer bars produced greater and longer-lasting contour-induced deviations. The evolution of the 2D response occurred over a period of 50–400 ms, depending on the relative proportions of 1D and 2D signals. As contours were displaced from the fovea the deviation decreased but much less so for early (1st 40 ms) than for late (subsequent 40 ms) pursuit initiation. These bottom-up effects could be overcome to a limited extent by the top-down influence of predictability. Finally, we observed that when animals were free to track any part of the bar, they spontaneously made short-latency saccades to the terminators on most trials, especially when the bars were tilted. This suggests an increased saliency of moving terminators, particularly when discrepancies exist among local motion signals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Tavassoli and D. L. Ringach Dynamics of Smooth Pursuit Maintenance J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 110 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. I. Braun, N. Mennie, C. Rasche, A. C. Schutz, M. J. Hawken, and K. R. Gegenfurtner Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements to Isoluminant Targets J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1287 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Montagnini, M. Spering, and G. S. Masson Predicting 2D Target Velocity Cannot Help 2D Motion Integration for Smooth Pursuit Initiation J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3545 - 3550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]