HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/2/914    most recent 00684.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, T. J. Articles by Zehr, E. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carroll, T. J. Articles by Zehr, E. P.

Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Rhythmic Arm Movement Than During Tonic Contraction

¹Health and Sports Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ²Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; ³Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria; and ⁴International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Submitted 30 June 2005; accepted in final form 20 October 2005

Humans perform rhythmic, locomotor movements with the arms and legs every day. Studies using reflexes to probe the functional role of the CNS suggest that spinal circuits are an important part of the neural control system for rhythmic arm cycling and walking. Here, by studying motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, and H-reflexes induced by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, we show a reduction in corticospinal excitability during rhythmic arm movement compared with tonic, voluntary contraction. Responses were compared between arm cycling and tonic contraction at four positions, while participants generated similar levels of muscle activity. Both H-reflexes and MEPs were significantly smaller during arm cycling than during tonic contraction at the midpoint of arm flexion (F = 13.51, P = 0.006; F = 11.83, P = 0.009). Subthreshold TMS significantly facilitated the FCR H-reflex during tonic contractions, but did not significantly modulate H-reflex amplitude during arm cycling. The data indicate a reduction in the responsiveness of cells constituting the fast, monosynaptic, corticospinal pathway during arm cycling and suggest that the motor cortex may contribute less to motor drive during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic, voluntary contraction. Our results are consistent with the idea that subcortical regions contribute to the control of rhythmic arm movements despite highly developed corticospinal projections to the human upper limb.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Verstynen, T. Konkle, and R. B. Ivry Two Types of TMS-Induced Movement Variability After Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1018 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]