HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1864    most recent 00627.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mysore, S. G. Articles by Orban, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mysore, S. G. Articles by Orban, G. A.

Processing of Kinetic Boundaries in Macaque V4

Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, K.U.Leuven Medical School, Leuven, Belgium

Submitted 16 June 2005; accepted in final form 30 October 2005

We used gratings and shapes defined by relative motion to study selectivity for static kinetic boundaries in macaque V4 neurons. Kinetic gratings were generated by random pixels moving in opposite directions in the neighboring bars, either parallel to the orientation of the boundary (parallel kinetic grating) or perpendicular to the boundary (orthogonal kinetic grating). Neurons were also tested with static, luminance defined gratings to establish cue invariance. In addition, we used eight shapes defined either by relative motion or by luminance contrast, as used previously to test cue invariance in the infero-temporal (IT) cortex. A sizeable fraction (10–20%) of the V4 neurons responded selectively to kinetic patterns. Most neurons selective for kinetic contours had receptive fields (RFs) within the central 10° of the visual field. Neurons selective for the orientation of kinetic gratings were defined as having similar orientation preferences for the two types of kinetic gratings, and the vast majority of these neurons also retained the same orientation preference for luminance defined gratings. Also, kinetic shape selective neurons had similar shape preferences when the shape was defined by relative motion or by luminance contrast, showing a cue-invariant form processing in V4. Although shape selectivity was weaker in V4 than what has been reported in the IT cortex, cue invariance was similar in the two areas, suggesting that invariance for luminance and motion cues of IT originates in V4. The neurons selective for kinetic patterns tended to be clustered within dorsal V4.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Janssen, S. Srivastava, S. Ombelet, and G. A. Orban Coding of Shape and Position in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6679 - 6690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Mysore, R. Vogels, S. E. Raiguel, and G. A. Orban Shape Selectivity for Camouflage-Breaking Dynamic Stimuli in Dorsal V4 Neurons Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1429 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-M. Shen, W.-F. Xu, and C.-Y. Li Cue-invariant detection of centre surround discontinuity by V1 neurons in awake macaque monkey J. Physiol., September 1, 2007; 583(2): 581 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Raiguel, R. Vogels, S. G. Mysore, and G. A. Orban Learning to see the difference specifically alters the most informative V4 neurons. J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6589 - 6602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nelissen, W. Vanduffel, and G. A. Orban Charting the lower superior temporal region, a new motion-sensitive region in monkey superior temporal sulcus. J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5929 - 5947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]