HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/4/2439    most recent 01236.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murray, S. O. Articles by Kersten, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murray, S. O. Articles by Kersten, D.

Spatially Specific fMRI Repetition Effects in Human Visual Cortex

¹Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and ²Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Submitted 29 November 2005; accepted in final form 30 December 2005

The functional MRI (fMRI) response to a pair of identical, successively presented stimuli can result in a smaller signal than the presentation of two nonidentical stimuli. This "repetition effect" has become a frequently used tool to make inferences about neural selectivity in specific cortical areas. However, little is known about the mechanism(s) underlying the effect. In particular, despite many successful applications of the technique in higher visual areas, repetition effects in lower visual areas [e.g., primary visual cortex (V1)] have been more difficult to characterize. One property that is well understood in early visual areas is the mapping of visual field locations to specific areas of the cortex (i.e., retinotopy). We used the retinotopic organization of V1 to activate progressively different populations of neurons in a rapid fMRI experimental design. We observed a repetition effect (reduced signal) when localized stimulus elements were repeated in identical locations. We show that this effect is spatially tuned and largely independent of both interstimulus interval (100–800 ms) and the focus of attention. Using the same timing parameters for which we observed a large effect of spatial position, we also examined the response to orientation changes and observed no effect of an orientation change on the response to repeated stimuli in V1 but significant effects in other retinotopic areas. Given these results, we discuss the possible causes of these repetition effects as well as the implications for interpreting other experiments that use this potentially powerful imaging technique.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B.-E. Verhoef, G. Kayaert, E. Franko, J. Vangeneugden, and R. Vogels Stimulus Similarity-Contingent Neural Adaptation Can Be Time and Cortical Area Dependent J. Neurosci., October 15, 2008; 28(42): 10631 - 10640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Altmann, O. Doehrmann, and J. Kaiser Selectivity for Animal Vocalizations in the Human Auditory Cortex Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2601 - 2608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Fang, S. O. Murray, and S. He Duration-Dependent fMRI Adaptation and Distributed Viewer-Centered Face Representation in Human Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1402 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]