HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/4/2456    most recent 01107.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ansuini, C. Articles by Castiello, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ansuini, C. Articles by Castiello, U.

Effects of End-Goal on Hand Shaping

¹Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy; ²Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; and ³Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom

Submitted 20 November 2005; accepted in final form 21 December 2005

The aim of the present study was to determine whether hand shaping was affected by planning of an action subsequent to object contact. Ten subjects (5 females and 5 males, ages 19–33) were requested to reach toward and grasp a convex object between the thumb and the four fingers of the right hand and to perform one of the following actions: 1) lift up the object; 2) insert the object into a niche of a similar shape and size as the object, or 3) insert the object into a rectangular niche much larger than the object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits were measured using resistive sensors embedded in a glove. Although all experimental conditions required grasping the same object, we found different covariation patterns among finger joint angles across conditions. Gradual preshaping of the hand occurred only when planning object lift or when the end-goal required object placement into the tight niche. In contrast, for the larger niche, gradual preshaping was not evident for the ring and the little finger. Further, reaching movements were faster for movements ending with the larger niche than for the other movement conditions. The present results suggest that hand shaping takes into account end-goal in addition to object geometry. We discuss these findings in the context of forward internal models that allow the prediction of the sensorimotor consequences of motor commands in advance to their execution.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. F. de C. Hamilton and S. T. Grafton Action Outcomes Are Represented in Human Inferior Frontoparietal Cortex Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1160 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Castiello and C. Begliomini The Cortical Control of Visually Guided Grasping Neuroscientist, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 157 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. P. Gardner, K. S. Babu, S. Ghosh, A. Sherwood, and J. Chen Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3708 - 3730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lukos, C. Ansuini, and M. Santello Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location J. Neurosci., April 4, 2007; 27(14): 3894 - 3903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]