HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/5/2898    most recent 00983.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kistemaker, D. A. Articles by Bobbert, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kistemaker, D. A. Articles by Bobbert, M. F.

Is Equilibrium Point Control Feasible for Fast Goal-Directed Single-Joint Movements?

Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Submitted 19 September 2005; accepted in final form 22 January 2006

Several types of equilibrium point (EP) controllers have been proposed for the control of posture and movement. EP controllers are appealing from a computational perspective because they do not require solving the "inverse dynamic problem" (i.e., computation of the torques required to move a system along a desired trajectory). It has been argued that EP controllers are not capable of controlling fast single-joint movements. To refute this statement, several extensions have been proposed, although these have been tested using models in which only the tendon compliance, force–length–velocity relation, and mechanical interaction between tendon and contractile element were not adequately represented. In the present study, fast elbow-joint movements were measured and an attempt was made to reproduce these using a realistic musculoskeletal model of the human arm. Three types of EP controllers were evaluated: an open-loop -controller, a closed-loop -controller, and a hybrid open- and closed-loop controller. For each controller we considered a continuous version and a version in which the control signals were sent out intermittently. Only the intermittent hybrid EP controller was capable of generating movements that were as fast as those of the subjects. As a result of the nonlinear muscle properties, the hybrid EP controller requires a more detailed representation of static muscle properties than generally assumed in the context of EP control. In sum, this study shows that fast single-joint movements can be realized without explicitly solving the inverse dynamics problem, but in a less straightforward manner than implied by proponents of conventional EP controllers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. Bobbert, L. J. R. Casius, I. W. T. Sijpkens, and R. T. Jaspers Humans adjust control to initial squat depth in vertical squat jumping J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2008; 105(5): 1428 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Erimaki and C. N. Christakos Coherent Motor Unit Rhythms in the 6-10 Hz Range During Time-Varying Voluntary Muscle Contractions: Neural Mechanism and Relation to Rhythmical Motor Control J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 473 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. Van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert Equilibrium Point Control Cannot be Refuted by Experimental Reconstruction of Equilibrium Point Trajectories J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1075 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]