HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/6/3502    most recent 00908.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rodgers, C. K. Articles by Paré, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rodgers, C. K. Articles by Paré, M.

Discharge Properties of Monkey Tectoreticular Neurons

¹Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Sensory-Motor Systems and Centre for Neuroscience Studies, and Departments of ²Physiology ³Psychology, and ⁴Anatomy and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 31 August 2005; accepted in final form 20 March 2006

The intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) contain neurons that clearly play a major role in regulating the production of saccadic eye movements: a burst of activity from saccade neurons (SNs) is thought to provide a drive signal to set the eyes in motion, whereas the tonic activity of fixation neurons (FNs) is thought to suppress saccades during fixation. The exact contribution of these neurons to saccade control is, however, unclear because the nature of the signals sent by the SC to the brain stem saccade generation circuit has not been studied in detail. Here we tested the hypothesis that the SC output signal is sufficient to control saccades by examining whether antidromically identified tectoreticular neurons (TRNs: 33 SNs and 13 FNs) determine the end of saccades. First, TRNs had discharge properties similar to those of nonidentified SC neurons and a proportion of output SNs had visually evoked responses, which signify that the saccade generator must receive and process visual information. Second, only a minority of TRNs possessed the temporal patterns of activity sufficient to terminate saccades: Output SNs did not cease discharging at the time of saccade end, possibly continuing to drive the brain stem during postsaccadic fixations, and output FNs did not resume their activity before saccade end. These results argue against a role for SC in regulating the timing of saccade termination by a temporal code and suggest that other saccade centers act to thwart the extraneous SC drive signal, unless it controls saccade termination by a spatial code.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Liu and M. A. Basso Substantia Nigra Stimulation Influences Monkey Superior Colliculus Neuronal Activity Bilaterally J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1098 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Rezvani and B. D. Corneil Recruitment of a Head-Turning Synergy by Low-Frequency Activity in the Primate Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 397 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Li and M. A. Basso Preparing to Move Increases the Sensitivity of Superior Colliculus Neurons J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4561 - 4577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kim and M. A. Basso Saccade Target Selection in the Superior Colliculus: A Signal Detection Theory Approach J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 2991 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]