JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 3712-3726, 2006. First published March 22, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00112.2006
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3712    most recent
00112.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barthélemy, F. V.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barthélemy, F. V.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G. S.

Behavioral Receptive Field for Ocular Following in Humans: Dynamics of Spatial Summation and Center-Surround Interactions

Frédéric V. Barthélemy, Ivo Vanzetta and Guillaume S. Masson

Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives de la Méditerranée, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 6193, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France

Submitted 1 February 2006; accepted in final form 7 March 2006

Visual neurons integrate information over a finite part of the visual field with high selectivity. This classical receptive field is modulated by peripheral inputs that play a role in both neuronal response normalization and contextual modulations. However, the consequences of these properties for visuomotor transformations are yet incompletely understood. To explore those, we recorded short-latency ocular following responses in humans to large center-only and center-surround stimuli. We found that eye movements are triggered by a mechanism that integrates motion over a restricted portion of the visual field, the size of which depends on stimulus contrast and increases as a function of time after response onset. We also found evidence for a strong nonisodirectional center-surround organization, responsible for normalizing the central, driving input so that motor responses are set to their most linear contrast dynamics. Such response normalization is delayed about 20 ms relative to tracking onset, gradually builds up over time, and is partly tuned for surround orientation/direction. These results outline the spatiotemporal organization of a behavioral receptive field, which might reflect a linear integration among subpopulations of cortical visual motion detectors.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. S. Masson, INCM–Team DyVA, UMR6193 CNRS, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille France (E-mail: Guillaume.Masson{at}incm.cnrs-mrs.fr)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Spering and K. R. Gegenfurtner
Contextual Effects on Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1353 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.