JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 3923-3927, 2006. First published February 8, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01120.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3923    most recent
01120.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by D'Esposito, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by D'Esposito, M.

REPORT

Selection and Maintenance of Saccade Goals in the Human Frontal Eye Fields

Clayton E. Curtis1 and Mark D'Esposito2

1Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York; and 2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Henry H. Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center, University of California, Berkeley, California

Submitted 24 October 2005; accepted in final form 1 February 2006

In a delayed-response task, response selection marks an important transition from sensory to motor processing. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we imaged the human brain during performance of a novel delayed-saccade task that isolated response selection from visual encoding and motor execution. The frontal eye fields (FEFs) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) both showed robust contra-lateralized activity time-locked to response selection. Moreover, response selection affected delay-period activity differently in these regions; it persisted throughout the memory delay period following response selection in the FEF but not IPS. Our results indicate that the FEF and IPS both make important but distinct contributions to spatial working memory. The mechanism that the FEF uses to support spatial working memory is tied to the selection and prospective coding of saccade goals, whereas the role of the IPS may be more tied to retrospective coding of sensory representations.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, 6 Washington Place, Room 859, New York University, New York City, NY 10003 (E-mail: clayton.curtis{at}nyu.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Praamstra, D. Kourtis, and K. Nazarpour
Simultaneous Preparation of Multiple Potential Movements: Opposing Effects of Spatial Proximity Mediated by Premotor and Parietal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2084 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. L. Prime, M. Vesia, and J. D. Crawford
TMS Over Human Frontal Eye Fields Disrupts Trans-saccadic Memory of Multiple Objects
Cereb Cortex, July 29, 2009; (2009) bhp148v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. R. Reynolds, R. West, and T. Braver
Distinct Neural Circuits Support Transient and Sustained Processes in Prospective Memory and Working Memory
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2009; 19(5): 1208 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Ikkai and C. E. Curtis
Cortical Activity Time Locked to the Shift and Maintenance of Spatial Attention
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1384 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Curtis and J. D. Connolly
Saccade Preparation Signals in the Human Frontal and Parietal Cortices
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T. A. Kelley, J. T. Serences, B. Giesbrecht, and S. Yantis
Cortical Mechanisms for Shifting and Holding Visuospatial Attention
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 114 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. R. G. Brown, T. Vilis, and S. Everling
Frontoparietal Activation With Preparation for Antisaccades
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1751 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. A. Epstein, W. E. Parker, and A. M. Feiler
Where Am I Now? Distinct Roles for Parahippocampal and Retrosplenial Cortices in Place Recognition
J. Neurosci., June 6, 2007; 27(23): 6141 - 6149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. P. Ferrera and J. Grinband
Perception, Memory, and Action in Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Focus on "Selection and Maintenance of Saccade Goals in the Human Frontal Eye Fields"
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3309 - 3310.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.