HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 96/2/730    most recent 00072.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Whitchurch, E. A. Articles by Takahashi, T. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Whitchurch, E. A. Articles by Takahashi, T. T.

Combined Auditory and Visual Stimuli Facilitate Head Saccades in the Barn Owl (Tyto alba)

Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon

Submitted 23 January 2006; accepted in final form 28 April 2006

The barn owl naturally responds to an auditory or visual stimulus in its environment with a quick head turn toward the source. We measured these head saccades evoked by auditory, visual, and simultaneous, co-localized audiovisual stimuli to quantify multisensory interactions in the barn owl. Stimulus levels ranged from near to well above saccadic threshold. In accordance with previous human psychophysical findings, the owl's saccade reaction times (SRTs) and errors to unisensory stimuli were inversely related to stimulus strength. Auditory saccades characteristically had shorter reaction times but were less accurate than visual saccades. Audiovisual trials, over a large range of tested stimulus combinations, had auditory-like SRTs and visual-like errors, suggesting that barn owls are able to use both auditory and visual cues to produce saccades with the shortest possible SRT and greatest accuracy. These results support a model of sensory integration in which the faster modality initiates the saccade and the slower modality remains available to refine saccade trajectory.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Zahar, A. Reches, and Y. Gutfreund Multisensory Enhancement in the Optic Tectum of the Barn Owl: Spike Count and Spike Timing J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2380 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Pluta and M. Kawasaki Multisensory enhancement of electromotor responses to a single moving object J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2008; 211(18): 2919 - 2930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Rowland, S. Quessy, T. R. Stanford, and B. E. Stein Multisensory Integration Shortens Physiological Response Latencies J. Neurosci., May 30, 2007; 27(22): 5879 - 5884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]