JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 975-988, 2006. First published May 24, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01112.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/975    most recent
01112.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. J.

TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY

Auditory Cortical Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus: Implications for an Auditory Midbrain Implant

Hubert H. Lim and David J. Anderson

Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Submitted 21 October 2005; accepted in final form 17 May 2006

The success and limitations of cochlear implants (CIs) along with recent advances in deep brain stimulation and neural engineering have motivated the development of a central auditory prosthesis. In this study, we investigated the effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICC) on primary auditory cortex (A1) activity to determine the potential benefits of an auditory midbrain implant (AMI). We recorded multiunit activity in A1 of ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs in response to single-pulse (200 µs/phase) monopolar stimulation of the ICC using multisite silicon-substrate probes. We then compared measures of threshold, dynamic range, and tonotopic spread of activation for ICC stimulation with that of published data for CI stimulation. Our results showed that compared with cochlear stimulation, ICC stimulation achieved: 1) thresholds about 8 dB lower; 2) dynamic ranges ≥4 dB greater; and 3) more localized, frequency-specific activation, even though frequency specificity was partially lost at higher stimulus levels for low-frequency ICC regions. Our results also showed that stimulation of rostral ICC regions elicited lower thresholds but with greater activation spread along the tonotopic gradient of A1 than did stimulation of more caudal regions. These results suggest that an AMI may improve frequency and level coding with lower energy requirements compared with CIs. However, a trade-off between lower perceptual thresholds and better frequency discrimination may exist that depends on location of stimulation along the caudorostral dimension of the ICC. Overall, this study provides the foundation for future AMI research and development.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. J. Anderson, University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122 (E-mail: dja{at}umich.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
H. H. Lim, M. Lenarz, and T. Lenarz
Auditory Midbrain Implant: A Review
Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2009; 13(3): 149 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown
Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. S. Malmierca, M. A. Izquierdo, S. Cristaudo, O. Hernandez, D. Perez-Gonzalez, E. Covey, and D. L. Oliver
A Discontinuous Tonotopic Organization in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat
J. Neurosci., April 30, 2008; 28(18): 4767 - 4776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. N. Shivdasani, S. J. Mauger, G. D. Rathbone, and A. G. Paolini
Inferior Colliculus Responses to Multichannel Microstimulation of the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus: Implications for Auditory Brain Stem Implants
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. H. Lim, T. Lenarz, G. Joseph, R.-D. Battmer, A. Samii, M. Samii, J. F. Patrick, and M. Lenarz
Electrical Stimulation of the Midbrain for Hearing Restoration: Insight into the Functional Organization of the Human Central Auditory System
J. Neurosci., December 5, 2007; 27(49): 13541 - 13551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. H. Lim and D. J. Anderson
Spatially Distinct Functional Output Regions within the Central Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus: Implications for an Auditory Midbrain Implant
J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8733 - 8743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. H. Lim and D. J. Anderson
Antidromic Activation Reveals Tonotopically Organized Projections From Primary Auditory Cortex to the Central Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus in Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1413 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.