JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 1789-1802, 2006. First published May 3, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00869.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1789    most recent
00869.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mileusnic, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mileusnic, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, G. E.

Mathematical Models of Proprioceptors. II. Structure and Function of the Golgi Tendon Organ

Milana P. Mileusnic and Gerald E. Loeb

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Alfred E. Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Submitted 18 August 2005; accepted in final form 2 March 2006

We developed a physiologically realistic mathematical model of the Golgi tendon organ (GTO) whose elements correspond to anatomical features of the biological receptor. The mechanical interactions of these elements enable it to capture all salient aspects of GTO afferent behavior reported in the literature. The model accurately describes the GTO's static and dynamic responses to activation of single motor units whose muscle fibers insert into the GTO, including the different static and dynamic sensitivities that exist for different types of muscle fibers (S, FR, and FF). Furthermore, it captures the phenomena of self- and cross-adaptation wherein the GTO dynamic response during motor unit activation is reduced by prior activation of the same or a different motor unit, respectively. The model demonstrates various degrees of nonlinear summation of GTO responses resulting from simultaneous activation of multiple motor units. Similarly to the biological GTO, the model suggests that the activation of every additional motor unit to already active motor units that influence the receptor will have a progressively weaker incremental effect on the GTO afferent activity. Finally, the proportional relationship between the cross-adaptation and summation recorded for various pairs of motor units was captured by the model, but only by incorporating a particular type of occlusion between multiple transduction regions that were previously suggested. This occlusion mechanism is consistent with the anatomy of the afferent innervation and its arrangement with respect to the collagen strands inserting into the GTO.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. P. Mileusnic, Alfred E. Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, 1042 Downey Way, Room DRB-B11, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1112 (E-mail: mileusni{at}usc.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Prochazka and S. Yakovenko
Predictive and reactive tuning of the locomotor CPG
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.