HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 96/5/2578    most recent 01086.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Townsend, B. R. Articles by Lemon, R. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Townsend, B. R. Articles by Lemon, R. N.

Linear Encoding of Muscle Activity in Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum

¹Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, and ²Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and ³Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Submitted 17 October 2005; accepted in final form 18 June 2006

The activity of neurons in primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum is known to correlate with extrinsic movement parameters, including hand position and velocity. Relatively few studies have addressed the encoding of intrinsic parameters, such as muscle activity. Here we applied a generalized regression analysis to describe the relationship of neurons in M1 and cerebellar dentate nucleus to electromyographic (EMG) activity from hand and forearm muscles, during performance of precision grip by macaque monkeys. We showed that cells in both M1 and dentate encode muscle activity in a linear fashion, and that EMG signals provide predictions of neural discharge that are equally accurate to those from kinematic information under these task conditions. Neural activity in M1 was significantly more correlated with both EMG and kinematic signals than was activity in dentate nucleus. Furthermore, the analysis enabled us to look at the temporal properties of muscle encoding. Cells were broadly tuned to muscle activity as a function of the lag between spiking and EMG and there was considerable heterogeneity in the optimal delay among individual neurons. However, a single lag (40 ms) was generally sufficient to provide good fits. Finally, incorporating spike history effects in our model offered no advantage in predicting novel spike trains, reinforcing the simple nature of the muscle encoding that we observed here.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Sehm, M.A. Perez, B. Xu, J. Hidler, and L.G. Cohen Functional Neuroanatomy of Mirroring during a Unimanual Force Generation Task Cereb Cortex, May 11, 2009; (2009) bhp075v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Griffin, H. M. Hudson, A. Belhaj-Saif, B. J. McKiernan, and P. D. Cheney Do Corticomotoneuronal Cells Predict Target Muscle EMG Activity? J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1169 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Soteropoulos and S. N. Baker Different Contributions of the Corpus Callosum and Cerebellum to Motor Coordination in Monkey J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2962 - 2973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jackson, J. Mavoori, and E. E. Fetz Correlations Between the Same Motor Cortex Cells and Arm Muscles During a Trained Task, Free Behavior, and Natural Sleep in the Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 360 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]