JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 2601-2612, 2006. First published July 19, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01245.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2601    most recent
01245.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geng, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geng, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.

On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes

Joy J. Geng1,2, Evelyn Eger1,2, Christian C. Ruff1,2, Árni Kristjánsson1,3, Pia Rotshtein1,2 and Jon Driver1,2

1UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology and 2Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and 3Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Submitted 29 November 2005; accepted in final form 10 June 2006

We used fMRI to investigate competition and on-line attentional selection between targets and distractors in opposite visual hemifields. Displays comprised a high-contrast square-wave grating, defined as target by its orientation, presented alone (unilateral) or with a similar distractor of orthogonal orientation in the opposite hemifield (bilateral displays). The target appeared unpredictably on the left or right, precluding anticipatory attention to one side. We found greater activation in target-contralateral superior occipital gyrus for unilateral than for bilateral displays, indicating suppression of the target’s visual representation by distractor presence despite the competing distractor projecting to a different occipital hemisphere. Several frontal and parietal regions showed greater activation for bilateral than unilateral trials, suggesting involvement in on-line attentional selection. This was particularly pronounced for regions in bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), which also showed greater functional coupling with occipital cortex specifically on bilateral trials that required selection plus some repetition-suppression effects when target side was repeated, but again only on bilateral trials requiring selection. Our results indicate that competition between visual stimuli in opposite hemifields can influence occipital cortex, and implicate IPS in resolution of this competition by selection.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. J. Geng, Center for Mind and Brain, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616 (jgeng{at}ucdavis.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychon Bull RevHome page
A. KRISTJANSSON, A. INGVARSDOTTIR, and U. D. TEITSDOTTIR
Object- and feature-based priming in visual search
Psychon Bull Rev, April 1, 2008; 15(2): 378 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Cicek, D. Gitelman, R. S. E. Hurley, A. Nobre, and M. Mesulam
Anatomical Physiology of Spatial Extinction
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2892 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.