JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 70-82, 2007. First published October 11, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00544.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/1/70    most recent
00544.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schieber, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rivlis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schieber, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rivlis, G.

Partial Reconstruction of Muscle Activity From a Pruned Network of Diverse Motor Cortex Neurons

Marc H. Schieber and Gil Rivlis

Departments of Neurology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Brain and Cognitive Science, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the Center for Visual Science, and the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program at St. Mary's Hospital, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

Submitted 21 May 2006; accepted in final form 6 October 2006

Primary motor cortex (M1) neurons traditionally have been viewed as "upper motor neurons" that directly drive spinal motoneuron pools, particularly during finger movements. We used spike-triggered averages (SpikeTAs) of electromyographic (EMG) activity to select M1 neurons whose spikes signaled the arrival of input in motoneuron pools, and examined the degree of similarity between the activity patterns of these M1 neurons and their target muscles during 12 individuated finger and wrist movements. Neuron–EMG similarity generally was low. Similarity was unrelated to the strength of the SpikeTA effect, to whether the effect was pure versus synchrony, or to the number of muscles influenced by the neuron. Nevertheless, the sum of M1 neuron activity patterns, each weighted by the sign and strength of its SpikeTA effect, could be more similar to the EMG than the average similarity of individual neurons. Significant correlations between the weighted sum of M1 neuron activity patterns and EMG were obtained in six of 17 muscles, but showed R2 values ranging from only 0.26 to 0.42. These observations suggest that additional factors—including inputs from sources other than M1 and nonlinear summation of inputs to motoneuron pools—also contributed substantially to EMG activity patterns. Furthermore, although each of these M1 neurons produced SpikeTA effects with a significant peak or trough 6–16 ms after the triggering spike, shifting the weighted sum of neuron activity to lead the EMG by 40–60 ms increased their similarity, suggesting that the influence of M1 neurons that produce SpikeTA effects includes substantial synaptic integration that in part may reach the motoneuron pools over less-direct pathways.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. H. Schieber, University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Neurology, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 673, Rochester, NY 14642 (E-mail: mhs{at}cvs.rochester.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Griffin, H. M. Hudson, A. Belhaj-Saif, B. J. McKiernan, and P. D. Cheney
Do Corticomotoneuronal Cells Predict Target Muscle EMG Activity?
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1169 - 1986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Yanai, N. Adamit, Z. Israel, R. Harel, and Y. Prut
Coordinate Transformation is First Completed Downstream of Primary Motor Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 13, 2008; 28(7): 1728 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.