HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/2/1319    most recent 00723.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ashida, H. Articles by Smith, A. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ashida, H. Articles by Smith, A. T.

fMRI Adaptation Reveals Separate Mechanisms for First-Order and Second-Order Motion

¹Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; ²Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, United Kingdom; and ³Cognitive Science Laboratory, The University of Trento, Trento, Italy

Submitted 16 April 2006; accepted in final form 27 November 2006

A key unresolved debate in human vision concerns whether we have two different low-level mechanisms for encoding image motion. Separate neural mechanisms have been suggested for first-order (luminance modulation) and second-order (e.g., contrast modulation) motion in the retinal image but a single mechanism could handle both. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has not so far convincingly revealed separate anatomical substrates. To examine whether two separate but co-localized mechanisms might exist, we used the technique of fast fMRI adaptation. We found direction-selective adaptation independently for each type of motion in the motion area V5/MT+ of the human brain. However, there was a total absence of cross-adaptation between first-order and second-order motion stimuli. This was true in both of the two subcomponents of MT+ (MT and MST) and similar results were found in V3A. This pattern of adaptation was consistent with psychophysical measurements of detection thresholds in similar stimulus sequences. The results provide strong evidence for separate neural populations that are responsible for detecting first- and second-order motion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Wu, H. Xu, P. Dayan, and N. Qian The Role of Background Statistics in Face Adaptation J. Neurosci., September 30, 2009; 29(39): 12035 - 12044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Fang, H. Boyaci, and D. Kersten Border Ownership Selectivity in Human Early Visual Cortex and its Modulation by Attention J. Neurosci., January 14, 2009; 29(2): 460 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]