HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/2/1642    most recent 01005.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van den Hurk, P. Articles by Toni, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van den Hurk, P. Articles by Toni, I.

Online Maintenance of Sensory and Motor Representations: Effects on Corticospinal Excitability

¹Nijmegen Medical Centre and ²F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging and Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Flexible behavior requires the ability to delay a response until it is appropriate. This can be achieved by holding either a sensory or a motor representation online. Here we assess whether maintenance of sensory or motor material drives the motor system to different functional states, as indexed by alterations of corticospinal excitability. We used single-pulse TMS to measure corticospinal excitability evoked during the delay period of a novel paradigm in which task contingencies, rather than explicit verbal instructions, induced participants to use either sensory or motor codes to solve a delay-nonmatch-to-sample (DNMS) task. This approach allowed us to probe the state of the motor system while the participants were retaining either sensory or motor codes to cross the delay period, rather than the control of short-term storage driven by verbal instructions. When participants could prepare the movement in advance (preparation trials), the excitability of the motor cortex contralateral to the moving hand increased, whereas the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex decreased. The increase in excitability was confined to the prime mover, whereas the decrease in excitability extended to cortical territories controlling muscles unrelated to the response. Crucially, these changes in excitability were evoked only during preparation trials and not during trials in which subjects needed to maintain sensory items online (memory trials). We infer that short-term storage of sensory information and preparation of motor responses have differential and specific access to the output stage of the motor system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Obhi, S. Matkovich, and R. Chen Changing the "When" and "What" of Intended Actions J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2755 - 2762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Makin, N. P. Holmes, C. Brozzoli, Y. Rossetti, and A. Farne Coding of Visual Space during Motor Preparation: Approaching Objects Rapidly Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Hand-Centered Coordinates J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11841 - 11851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Duque and R. B. Ivry Role of Corticospinal Suppression during Motor Preparation Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2009; 19(9): 2013 - 2024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.C.M. van Wijk, A. Daffertshofer, N. Roach, and P. Praamstra A Role of Beta Oscillatory Synchrony in Biasing Response Competition? Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 1294 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]