JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 2663-2675, 2007. First published February 7, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00308.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/2663    most recent
00308.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giszter, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Graziani, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giszter, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Graziani, V.

Motor Strategies Used by Rats Spinalized at Birth to Maintain Stance in Response to Imposed Perturbations

Simon F. Giszter1,*, Michelle R. Davies1,* and Virginia Graziani2,*

1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine; and 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 22 March 2006; accepted in final form 31 January 2007

Some rats spinalized P1/P2 achieve autonomous weight-supported locomotion and quiet stance as adults. We used force platforms and robot-applied perturbations to test such spinalized rats (n = 6) that exhibited both weight-supporting locomotion and stance, and also normal rats (n = 8). Ground reaction forces in individual limbs and the animals' center of pressure were examined. In normal rats, both forelimbs and hindlimbs participated actively to control horizontal components of ground reaction forces. Rostral perturbations increased forelimb ground reaction forces and caudal perturbations increased hindlimb ground reaction forces. Operate rats carried 60% body weight on the forelimbs and had a more rostral center of pressure placement. The pattern in normal rats was to carry significantly more weight on the hindlimbs in quiet stance (roughly 60%). The strategy of operate rats to compensate for perturbations was entirely in forelimbs; as a result, the hindlimbs were largely isolated from the perturbation. Stiffness magnitude of the whole body was measured: its magnitude was hourglass shaped, with the principal axis oriented rostrocaudally. Operate rats were significantly less stiff—only 60–75% of normal rats' stiffness. The injured rats adopt a stance strategy that isolates the hindlimbs from perturbation and may thus prevent hindlimb loadings. Such loadings could initiate reflex stepping, which we observed. This might activate lumbar pattern generators used in their locomotion. Adult spinalized rats never achieve independent hindlimb weight-supported stance. The stance strategy of the P1 spinalized rats differed strongly from the behavior of intact rats and may be difficult for rats spinalized as adults to master.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Giszter, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129 (E-mail simon.giszter{at}drexel.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Kao, J. S. Shumsky, M. Murray, and K. A. Moxon
Exercise Induces Cortical Plasticity after Neonatal Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat
J. Neurosci., June 10, 2009; 29(23): 7549 - 7557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Giszter, M. R. Davies, A. Ramakrishnan, U. I. Udoekwere, and W. J. Kargo
Trunk Sensorimotor Cortex Is Essential for Autonomous Weight-Supported Locomotion in Adult Rats Spinalized as P1/P2 Neonates
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 839 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.