HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/4/2676    most recent 01081.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Darainy, M. Articles by Ostry, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Darainy, M. Articles by Ostry, D. J.

Control of Hand Impedance Under Static Conditions and During Reaching Movement

¹Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ²Department of Engineering, Shahed University; and ³Department of Biomedical Engineering, AmirKabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; and ⁴Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut

Submitted 10 October 2006; accepted in final form 2 February 2007

It is known that humans can modify the impedance of the musculoskeletal periphery, but the extent of this modification is uncertain. Previous studies on impedance control under static conditions indicate a limited ability to modify impedance, whereas studies of impedance control during reaching in unstable environments suggest a greater range of impedance modification. As a first step in accounting for this difference, we quantified the extent to which stiffness changes from posture to movement even when there are no destabilizing forces. Hand stiffness was estimated under static conditions and at the same position during both longitudinal (near to far) and lateral movements using a position-servo technique. A new method was developed to predict the hand "reference" trajectory for purposes of estimating stiffness. For movements in a longitudinal direction, there was considerable counterclockwise rotation of the hand stiffness ellipse relative to stiffness under static conditions. In contrast, a small counterclockwise rotation was observed during lateral movement. In the modeling studies, even when we used the same modeled cocontraction level during posture and movement, we found that there was a substantial difference in the orientation of the stiffness ellipse, comparable with that observed empirically. Indeed, the main determinant of the orientation of the ellipse in our modeling studies was the movement direction and the muscle activation associated with movement. Changes in the cocontraction level and the balance of cocontraction had smaller effects. Thus even when there is no environmental instability, the orientation of stiffness ellipse changes during movement in a manner that varies with movement direction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Darainy, A. A. G. Mattar, and D. J. Ostry Effects of Human Arm Impedance on Dynamics Learning and Generalization J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3158 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wong, E. T. Wilson, N. Malfait, and P. L. Gribble Limb Stiffness Is Modulated With Spatial Accuracy Requirements During Movement in the Absence of Destabilizing Forces J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1542 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wong, E. T. Wilson, N. Malfait, and P. L. Gribble The Influence of Visual Perturbations on the Neural Control of Limb Stiffness J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 246 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Lametti, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry Control of Movement Variability and the Regulation of Limb Impedance J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3516 - 3524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]