JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 214-223, 2007. First published May 9, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00990.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/1/214    most recent
00990.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dessem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ambalavanar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dessem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ambalavanar, R.

Nociceptive Craniofacial Muscle Primary Afferent Neurons Synapse in Both the Rostral and Caudal Brain Stem

Dean Dessem, Masayuki Moritani and Ranjinidevi Ambalavanar

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 17 September 2006; accepted in final form 3 May 2007

Limited information is available on muscle afferent neurons with fine fibers despite their presumed participation in musculoskeletal disorders, including temporomandibular disorders. To study these neurons, intracellular recordings were made from the central axons of slowly conducting muscle afferent neurons in anesthetized rats. After intraaxonal impalement, axons were characterized by masseter nerve stimulation, receptive field testing, muscle stretching and intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline. Intracellular recordings were made from 310 axons (conduction velocity: 6.5–60M/s, mean = 27.3M/s; following frequency: 27–250 Hz, mean = 110Hz). No neurons responded to cutaneous palpation or muscle stretching. Some axons (n = 34) were intracellularly stained with biotinamide. These neurons were classified as group II/III noxious mechanoreceptors because their mechanical threshold exceeded 15 mN, and conduction velocities ranged from 12 to 40.2M/s (mean = 25.3M/s). Two morphological types were recognized by using an object-based, three-dimensional colocalization methodology to locate synapses. One type (IIIHTMVp-Vc) possessed axon collaterals that emerged along the entire main axon and synapsed in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus and spinal trigeminal subnuclei oralis (Vo), interpolaris (Vi), and caudalis (Vc). A second type (IIIHTMVo-Vc) possessed axon collaterals that synapsed only in caudal Vo, Vi, and Vc. Our previous studies show that muscle spindle afferent neurons are activated by innocuous stimuli and synapse in the rostral and caudal brain stem; here we demonstrate that nociceptive muscle mechanoreceptor afferent axons also synapse in rostral and caudal brain stem regions. Traditional dogma asserts that the most rostral trigeminal sensory complex exclusively processes innocuous somatosensory information, whereas caudal portions receive nociceptive sensory input; the data reported here do not support this paradigm.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Dessem, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 (E-mail: ddessem{at}umaryland.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.